4 Responses to “To See or not to See: Lighting Occupancy Sensors”

  1. alec January 2, 2013 at 4:58 pm #

    Cool stuff! Any figures on the energy that goes into manufacturing these things? I’m not too familiar with the embedded energy of things, or even how much that’s monitored, but curious how much energy goes into the materials extraction and processing, manufacturing, and shipping of these(and other) things. Cheers!

    • raphael January 13, 2013 at 2:21 pm #

      Alec, the good news is you’ve asked an excellent question. The bad news I don’t know the answer. Given the small size of occupancy sensors, the embedded emissions from manufacturing and distributing them is probably quite small compared to the amount of energy they save. If solar panels have about a 3-year payback in terms of their embedded emissions, then occupancy sensors, given their small size and ability to control many lights many more hours of the year than panels produce energy, are probably much smaller. I would guess-timate that on average, occupancy sensors have roughly a few month payback in terms of embedded emissions.

  2. Lindsay April 14, 2013 at 3:36 pm #

    What a great overview on how occupancy sensors can help us keep our lighting usage in check! I’m wondering, how is the technology evolving for light level sensors? Would the additional energy savings be significant when paired with the technology of either of these occupancy sensors? It would be great to have lighting in an office or home automatically dim or brighten based on the amount of ambient light in a room!

    • brenden April 15, 2013 at 7:19 am #

      Hi Lindsay,

      Great questions. I think the exciting technology advances for lighting are less on the actual sensor side at this point, and more on communications and control. If you could take the data from lighting occupancy sensors and pass it to a building’s HVAC system, there’s the potential for huge savings. There are now a number of companies trying to do this, and integrated lighting/HVAC control is only a few years away from being a cost-effective way to further reduce energy use using existing infrastructure.

      As for automatically dimming lights that turn down when there is a lot of daylight, those sensors also exist. The challenge there is at the ballast, which is the part of a lighting system that lets a bulb physically dim. Here too there is progress, although it remains slow compared to the cost hurdles.

      Best,
      Brenden

Leave a Reply